Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Somehow, I don't buy this...

There was an incident on Luke Air Force Base in Arizona, last night. A couple of guys in a stolen car were trying to rush a gate, forcing the guard to open fire. One twerp was killed, the other injured.

The official story is that this has nothing to do with terrorism; that the two were nothing more than run-of-the-mill car thieves.

Our current administration is looking weaker by the day, almost begging for more attacks with the way they've handled those that have actually happened.

I would be willing to bet that, American born or not, the two car thieves in Arizona were radical Muslims.


  1. Is it "weaker" or is it impossible
    to catch all terrorists before they

    Our large geographics keeps us from getting physically invaded
    by a large group--but our size
    also gives lots of nooks and crannies for terrorists to get in and do 'their job'.......

  2. I think it is possible to catch terrorists before they strike. However, that takes being willing to scrap the pc bullshit that keeps us from using the same methods Israel uses on their flights and in their military: racial profiling.

    And, we need to start making highly public examples to deter terrorists from attacking us (say, televised firing squads with the soldiers using the gun oil that contains 13% liquefied pig fat in the barrels of their rifles), rather than tying our troops' and intelligence agencies' hands behind their backs with pc ROE.


Sorry, folks. A hundred plus spam comments in an hour equals moderation on older posts, so until further notice...you're gonna have to wait for your comments to be approved before they show up.